Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÇϾǰñÀÇ ¹ßÀ°ÁßÀÎ »ýÁã¿¡¼­ ±â´É·ÂÀÇ º¯È­°¡ ƯÀÌ-À¯ÀüÀÚ ¹ßÇö¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

THE EFFECT OF ALTERED FUNCTIONAL FORCE ON THE EXPRESSION OF SPECFIC MRNAS IN THE DEVELOPING MOUSE MANDIBLE

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2003³â 30±Ç 2È£ p.308 ~ 319
±èÇüÅÂ, ¹ÚÁÖö, Á¶¿µ°ï, ¹ÚÇ嵿,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÇüÅ (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇÐ
¹ÚÁÖö (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ ±¸°­Á¶Á÷ÇÐ ±³½Ç
Á¶¿µ°ï (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇÐ
¹ÚÇ嵿 (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇÐ

Abstract

±â´É·ÂÀº »ÀÀÇ Çü¼º, À¯Áö ¹× °³Á¶ ÀÌ¿Ü¿¡µµ Ä¡¾ÆÀ̵¿, ±³Á¤Ä¡·á, ±â´É¼º ¾Ç±³Á¤ÀåÄ¡ÀÇ »ç¿ë µÕ°ú °ü·ÃÇÑ Ä¡ÁÖÀδ뼼Æ÷ÀÇ Æ¯¼º º¯È­ µî¿¡ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ£´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ, ÇϾǰúµÎ¿¡¼­µµ ±â´É·ÂÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ µû¶ó¼­ ´Ù¾çÇÑ Æ¯¼ºÀÇ º¯È­°¡ ³ªÅ¸³­´Ù.
º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ICR »ýÁ㸦 8ÁÖ µ¿¾È soft-diet¿Í hard-dietÀÇ ½ÄÀÌ Á¶ÀýÀ» ÅëÇØ ±â´É·ÂÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ À¯µµÇÏ¿©, ±â´É·ÂÀÇ º¯È­¿Í °ü·ÃÇÑ Æ¯ÀÌ À¯ÀüÀÚ¸¦ °ËÃâÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© subtractive hybridization, northern ºÐ¼® ¹× mRNA in-situ hybidization µîÀÇ ½ÇÇèÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. Soft-diet±º°ú hard-diet±ºÀÇ subtractive hybridizationÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© ÃÑ 39°³ÀÇ cloneÀ» ¾ò¾ú°í ÀÌÁß¿¡¼­ 11°³ÀÇ ¼­·Î ´Ù¸¥ hard-diet±º ƯÀÌ Èĺ¸ À¯ÀüÀÚµéÀ» ºÐ¸®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
2. 11°³ÀÇ Èĺ¸ À¯ÀüÀÚµé Áß¿¡¼­ homology °Ë»ö°ú northern ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇÏ¿© ±â´É·Â°ú °ü·ÃÀÌ ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÇ°Å³ª hard-diet±º¿¡¼­ mRNA°¡ ¼±ÅÃÀûÀ¸·Î ¹ßÇöµÇ´Â FS-s2, FS-s5, FS-s18 ¹× Fs-s22 À¯ÀüÀÚ¸¦ ¼±ÅÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.
3. Soft-diet±º°ú hard-diet±ºÀÇ ÇüÅÂÇÐÀû ºÐ¼®¿¡¼­ soft-diet±ºÀº hard-diet±º¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© °ñ¸ð¼¼Æ÷ÀÇ È°¼º°ú °ñ°³Á¶ÀÇ Æ¯¼ºÀº ÀúÇÏµÈ °ÍÀ¸·Î °üÂûµÇ¾úÀ¸³ª, ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ ¿¬°ñ¼º°ñÈ­ °úÁ¤Àº ¿À·£ ½Ã°£µ¿¾È Áö¼ÓµÇ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
4. FS-s2, FS-s5, FS-s18 ¹× Fs-s22 À¯ÀüÀÚÀÇ cRNA ŽħÀÚ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ in-situ hybridization¿¡¼­ 4°³ÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚÀÇ mRNAµéÀº hard-diet±ºÀÇ ¼¼Æ÷µé¿¡¼­´Â °­ÇÏ°Ô ¹ßÇöµÇ¾úÀ¸³ª soft-diet±ºÀÇ ¼¼Æ÷µé¿¡¼­´Â ±× ¹ßÇöÀÌ ¹Ì¾àÇϰųª ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇÏ¿© FS-s2, FS-s5, FS-sl8 ¹× Fs-s22 À¯ÀüÀÚµéÀº ´ëºÎºÐÀÌ ±â´ÉÀÌ °ÅÀÇ ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖÁö ¾Ê´Â °Íµé·Î ±â´É·ÂÀÇ º¯È­ °úÁ¤¿¡¼­ Áß¿äÇÑ ¿ªÇÒÀ» ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÇ³ª ¾ÕÀ¸·Î º¸¿Ï ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÅëÇÏ¿© °¢°¢ÀÇ À¯ÀüÀÚµéÀÇ º¸´Ù Á¤È®ÇÑ ±â´ÉÀ» ÀÌÇØÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÇÊ¿ä ÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
Mechanical forces are known to have an effect on bone formation, maintenance and remodeling, and there is evidence that the development of the mandibular condyle in the rat or mouse is influenced by altered functional force. However, studies are lacking in molecular-biologic mechanism such as the identification of differentiation factor induced from functional force. Here a mouse model was used to investigate the functional stress-responsive gene or factors which is related to the altered force by comparing the expression genes of functional state and hypo-functional state of the mouse mandible.
ICR mice were provisioned with either a soft, mushy diet (soft-diet group) or hard rat pellets (hard-diet group) beginning at weaning for the alteration of functional force and subsequently sacrificed at 89 days of age. Incisor of mice in group 1 were trimmed twice a week to reduce occlusal forces. After killing the animals, mandibular bone including condyle were collected for RNA extraction, subtractive hybridization, northern blot analysis and mRNA in-situ hybridization.
The results as follows;
1. A total of 39 clones were sequenced, and 11 individual sequence types were subsequently identified by sub-tractive hybridization, as 28 clones were represented twice in the analyzed sets.
2. Consequently four candidate clones, FS-s (functional stress-specific)2, -5, -18, and -22 were identified and characterized by homolgy search and northern analysis. Four of these clones, FS-s2, -5. -18, and -22, were shown to be expressed differentially in the hard-diet group.
3. Histologic sections showed that osteoblastic activity along the bone trabeculae and active bone remodeling were significantly lower in soft than in hard diet animals. A soft diet seems to enable a longer period of endochondral ossification in the mandibular condyle.
4. Although the mRNAs of FS-s2, -5, -18, and -22 were expressed rarely by cells of the soft-diet group, highest expression was detected in the cells of the hard-diet group.
Together with the above results, it is suggested that FS-s2, -5, -18, and -22 could act as an important factors controlling the tissue changes in response to functional stress. The exact functional significance of these findings remains to be established.

Å°¿öµå

À¯µ¿½Ä;Hard-diet;±â´É·Â;ƯÀÌ mRNA;ÇϾÇ;Soft-diet;Hard-diet;Functional force;Specific mRNA;Mandible

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI